Descartes said- ‘I think therefore I am’. I wonder to how
many people he could truly explain this. I wonder how many people have truly
understood what he said. ‘Saying’, grown to ‘talking’ is a bit of a problem.
Thinking is fine; it has a limited domain. But talking is difficult. Talking
requires an effort of construction- and that too an appropriate construction.
We’re all builders; we try to build our lives. One block after another, piece
by piece- we try to make our places. But building sentences needs deliberation.
I can think, I can think in my sub-conscious. But when it comes to engaging
basic faculties of another human being, I am at a loss. I lose myself to the
idea that I don’t have the capacity. It’s like traversing the unknown grounds
with invisible pitfalls. One doesn’t really want to fall in the holes so one
resorts to reconnaissance. It’s as if I project myself elsewhere- like radar to
know what rocks I might encounter. I am always pulsating to find, to search but
with equal derision for myself, my being. The derision foretells the story of rejection-
the rejection of my being from an unchartered context.
Let me tell you the story of the time when all this started.
It was a time of great impacts and great distinctions. The theory of ‘single
child’ is appropriate; it causes great harm to be alone- for it leads to
distorted speech, dehumanized bedrooms and play areas full of imaginary
friends. Now the great thing about the imaginary friends is that they know you-
so you don’t have to explain anything to them. It is through one’s soul unknown
to oneself that a child alone fabricates his universe. The communication is in
whispers, in countless lost moments of togetherness. One may talk- and the
other may listen. Here, in the bedroom of the single child- one may talk and
everybody may listen. Everybody is present by their absence. The child has the
sun to talk to in the day and the moon to talk to in the night. Certain wind
may carry his words elsewhere- but hardly to any place where they are not misconstrued.
The friendly chatter is too much clamour and too much clamour is excess of
silence and silence is the infinity. Like Simon and Garfunkel said-
And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
And no one dared
Disturb the sound of silence
So yes, no one dares disturb the sound of silence. Silence
and the being exist in singularity. Vaguely do I remember the song of other
voices but hardly have I forgotten my own melodies. Vaguely do I recall
touching hands all the time but never do I forget my own complicated being.
It’s what I call the internalized form- and what they think is a melodrama. It’s
what they call confusing and what I call ambiguous. I don’t think I exist in the binary logic of
nature – culture. Neither have I had a stand of a Unitarian rejecting the
trinity. I look forward to form a perception; I close my eyes for a moment or
so. That is where I encounter the countless moments of solitude. The reconnaissance is only for the well being
of my faculties. Reconnaissance is to know that something beyond me exists. And
here fore, I begin my construction of sentences to tell you the relatively true
story of silence in excess.
No comments:
Post a Comment